Ensuring safe functioning of market mechanism

Prices convey a lot of information. It not only tells producers what to produce but rather informs the producers to produce what people want. The more inaccurate the information gets, the lesser will be the economic coordination which will in turn lower satisfaction of wants. Thus interference in the information conveyed by prices is destructive to the economic progress of an economy.

We often fear that an increase in competition and advancement in technology will take away the traditional livelihoods of the people. Norman Macrae, an editor of the Economist, pointed out that with the advent of Industrial Revolution in England, about two thirds of the jobs that existed in the beginning of the century was eliminated by the end of the century, yet there were three times as many people employed at the end of the century. But the jobs were not the same. He pointed out that in the late 1880s, about 60 per cent of the workforce in both the United States and Britain were in agriculture, domestic service and jobs related to horse transport. Today, only 3 per cent of the work force are in those occupations. Jobs will change with competition, but there will always be more new jobs created than the ones lost. 

Kerala being a literate state was subject to this primal fear during the computerisation drive in 1990s. In fact, when the agitation against computerisation subsided and computers replaced manual labour in banks and government offices, employees in Kerala found an enhancement in the quality of their job without leaving anybody unemployed. 

The duty of the government must not be to preserve jobs but to equip individuals to grab better jobs.